Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066434›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

A radiomics based method for prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score using enlarged region of interest.

Haoming Zhuang, Aritrick Chatterjee, Xiaobing Fan, Shouliang Qi, Wei Qian, Dianning He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haoming ZhuangCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Aritrick ChatterjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Xiaobing FanDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Shouliang QiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Wei QianCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Dianning HeCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. hedn@bmie.neu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82001781Science and Technology Foundation of Liaoning Provincial 2020 BS-049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in men worldwide, and its timely diagnosis and treatment are becoming increasingly important. MRI is in increasing use to diagnose cancer and to distinguish between non-clinically significant and clinically significant PCa, leading to more precise diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study is to present a radiomics-based method for determining the Gleason score (GS) for PCa using tumour heterogeneity on multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI).

methodsTwenty-six patients with biopsy-proven PCa were included in this study. The quantitative T2 values, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and signal enhancement rates (α) were calculated using multi-echo T2 images, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), for the annotated region of interests (ROI). After texture feature analysis, ROI range expansion and feature filtering was performed. Then obtained data were put into support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and other classifiers for binary classification.

resultsThe highest classification accuracy was 73.96% for distinguishing between clinically significant (Gleason 3 + 4 and above) and non-significant cancers (Gleason 3 + 3) and 83.72% for distinguishing between Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, which was achieved using initial ROIs drawn by the radiologists. The accuracy improved when using expanded ROIs to 80.67% using SVM and 88.42% using Bayesian classification for distinguishing between clinically significant and non-significant cancers and Gleason 3 + 4 from Gleason 4 + 3 and above, respectively.

conclusionsOur results indicate the research significance and value of this study for determining the GS for prostate cancer using the expansion of the ROI region.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsBayes TheoremDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesGleason scoreMachine learningMultiparametric MRIProstate cancerTexture feature

Identifiers

PMID38066434
PMCPMC10709874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.