Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066425›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

The efficacy of intrauterine infusion of platelet rich plasma in women undergoing assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Noran Magdy Shalma, Hazem Mohamed Salamah, Ashraf Alsawareah, Ahmad Shehata Shaarawy, Mohamed Reyad Mohamed, Emery Manirambona, Mohamed Abd-ElGawad

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Value of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Reproductive Disorders: An Umbrella Review.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Noran Magdy ShalmaFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Othman Ibn-Affan Street, Beside Tanta Sporting Club, Tanta, Egypt. nouran_30942456@med.tanta.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-7213
Hazem Mohamed SalamahFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ashraf AlsawareahFaculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Ahmad Shehata ShaarawyFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Reyad MohamedFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Emery ManirambonaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Mohamed Abd-ElGawadFaculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EGFayoum University · EGHashemite University · JOTanta University · EGUniversity of Rwanda · RWZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous platelet concentration recently used in the reproductive field. Studies had conflicting results regarding its effect on pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to solve the debate on the safety and efficacy of PRP in women undergoing assisted reproduction and assess the influence of covariates on the outcomes of PRP infusion.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science in May 2023. We included randomized and non-randomized clinical trials as well as cohort studies assessing intrauterine PRP in sub fertile women undergoing assisted reproduction (IVF/ICSI). For the quality assessment, We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1, the ROBINS-I tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We pooled the data using RevMan version 5.4.

resultsThe data from 23 studies were pooled. PRP had favorable outcomes compared with the control group on clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.09; P < 0.00001), live birth rate (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.47; P = 0.001), and miscarriages (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.72; P = 0.0002). Women with repeated implantation failure had a significantly improved clinical pregnancy rate (RR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.24; P < 0.00001), live birth rate (RR:1.83, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.51; P = 0.002), and miscarriage rate (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31 to 068; P = 0.0001).

conclusionPRP showed promising results in assisted reproductive techniques. Further large and multicenter RCTs are required to compare the doses of PRP while identifying the specific population with the most benefits from PRP.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousInfertility, FemalePlatelet-Rich PlasmaFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedAssisted reproductionIn vitro fertilizationIVFPlatelet rich plasmaPRPRepeated implantation failure

Identifiers

PMID38066425
PMCPMC10704776
OpenAlexW4389486051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.