Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066424›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Hierarchical classification-based pan-cancer methylation analysis to classify primary cancer.

Youpeng Yang, Qiuhong Zeng, Gaotong Liu, Shiyao Zheng, Tianyang Luo, Yibin Guo, Jia Tang, Yi Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Youpeng YangMedicine School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Qiuhong ZengGeneplus-Shenzhen Institute, Shenzhen, 518118, China.
Gaotong LiuGeneplus-Shenzhen Institute, Shenzhen, 518118, China.
Shiyao ZhengMedicine School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Tianyang LuoMedicine School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China.
Yibin GuoMedicine School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518107, China. guoyibin@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jia TangNHC Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital), Guangzhou, 510062, China. tony2081129@163.com.
Yi HuangGeneplus-Shenzhen Institute, Shenzhen, 518118, China. huangyi@geneplus.org.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2022A1515220204Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation 201905010003Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province A2022104Min-Yue Cooperative Research Fund 71010025National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 82270600Research Foundation of Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute QD202201Sun Yat-sen University Tongchuang Intelligent Medical interdisciplinary talent training Foundation 76160-3090319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hierarchical classification offers a more specific categorization of data and breaks down large classification problems into subproblems, providing improved prediction accuracy and predictive power for undefined categories, while also mitigating the impact of poor-quality data. Despite these advantages, its application in predicting primary cancer is rare. To leverage the similarity of cancers and the specificity of methylation patterns among them, we developed the Cancer Hierarchy Classification Tool (CHCT) using the idea of hierarchical classification, with methylation data from 30 cancer types and 8239 methylome samples downloaded from publicly available databases (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)). We used unsupervised clustering to divide the classification subproblems and screened differentially methylated sites using Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, Tukey-kramer test, and Boruta algorithms to construct models for each classifier module. After validation, CHCT accurately classified 1568 out of 1660 cases in the test set, with an average accuracy of 94.46%. We further curated an independent validation cohort of 677 cancer samples from GEO and assigned a diagnosis using CHCT, which showed high diagnostic potential with generally high accuracies (an average accuracy of 91.40%). Moreover, CHCT demonstrates predictive capability for additional cancer types beyond its original classifier scope as demonstrated in the medulloblastoma and pituitary tumor datasets. In summary, CHCT can hierarchically classify primary cancer by methylation profile, by splitting a large-scale classification of 30 cancer types into ten smaller classification problems. These results indicate that cancer hierarchical classification has the potential to be an accurate and robust cancer classification method.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAlgorithmsDNA MethylationEpigenomeHumansMethylationCancerClassificationCluster analysisMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38066424
PMCPMC10709847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.