ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Genetic Engineering and Rebooting of Bacteriophages in L-Form Bacteria.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated System for Geobacillus Protoplast Formation, Transfection, Recombinant Genomes Rebooting, Efficient Propagation, and Genomic DNA Isolation of the Thermophilic Bacteriophage TP-84.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 enables efficient genome engineering of the strictly lytic, broad-host-range staphylococcal bacteriophage K.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Heterodimerization of staphylococcal phage φ2638A endolysin isoforms and their functional role in bacterial lysis.microLife · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid increase of circulating, antibiotic-resistant pathogens is a major ongoing global health crisis, and arguably, the end of the "golden age of antibiotics" is looming. This has led to a surge in research and development of alternative antimicrobials, including bacteriophages, to treat such infections (phage therapy). Isolating natural phage variants for the treatment of individual patients is an arduous and time-consuming task. Furthermore, the use of natural phages is frequently hampered by natural limitations, such as moderate in vivo activity, the rapid emergence of resistance, insufficient host range, or the presence of undesirable genetic elements within the phage genome. Targeted genetic editing of wild-type phages (phage engineering) has successfully been employed in the past to mitigate some of these pitfalls and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of the underlying phage variants. Clearly, there is a large potential for the development of novel, marker-less genome-editing methodologies to facilitate the engineering of therapeutic phages. Steady advances in synthetic biology have facilitated the in vitro assembly of modified phage genomes, which can be activated ("rebooted") upon transformation of a suitable host cell. However, this can prove challenging, especially in difficult-to-transform Gram-positive bacteria. In this chapter, we detail the production of cell wall-deficient L-form bacteria and their application to activate synthetic genomes of phages infecting Gram-positive host species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.