Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066374›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Genetic Engineering and Rebooting of Bacteriophages in L-Form Bacteria.

Jonas Fernbach, Susanne Meile, Samuel Kilcher, Martin J Loessner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas FernbachInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Susanne MeileInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Samuel KilcherInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Martin J LoessnerInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. martin.loessner@ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increase of circulating, antibiotic-resistant pathogens is a major ongoing global health crisis, and arguably, the end of the "golden age of antibiotics" is looming. This has led to a surge in research and development of alternative antimicrobials, including bacteriophages, to treat such infections (phage therapy). Isolating natural phage variants for the treatment of individual patients is an arduous and time-consuming task. Furthermore, the use of natural phages is frequently hampered by natural limitations, such as moderate in vivo activity, the rapid emergence of resistance, insufficient host range, or the presence of undesirable genetic elements within the phage genome. Targeted genetic editing of wild-type phages (phage engineering) has successfully been employed in the past to mitigate some of these pitfalls and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of the underlying phage variants. Clearly, there is a large potential for the development of novel, marker-less genome-editing methodologies to facilitate the engineering of therapeutic phages. Steady advances in synthetic biology have facilitated the in vitro assembly of modified phage genomes, which can be activated ("rebooted") upon transformation of a suitable host cell. However, this can prove challenging, especially in difficult-to-transform Gram-positive bacteria. In this chapter, we detail the production of cell wall-deficient L-form bacteria and their application to activate synthetic genomes of phages infecting Gram-positive host species.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaGene EditingGenetic EngineeringGram-Positive BacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophage engineeringL-form bacteriaPhage therapySynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID38066374
OpenAlexW4389474926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.