ArticlePharmacoEconomics2024
A Framework for the Fair Pricing of Medicines.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Estimating the Share of Social Surplus Generated by Pharmaceutical Innovation Accruing to Manufacturers: A Systematic Literature Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Pooled it
- Balancing Innovation and Access: Insights from AIM's Fair Pricing Model and Its Current and Future Applications.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Exploring the consequences of including off-patent prices in reimbursement decisions for patented drugs.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- A Modern Approach for Constructing Decision Analytic Models in Microsoft Excel.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Politicised Changes to the NICE Threshold Risk Making Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Performative, Not Informative.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Economic Consequences of Increasing the NICE Cost-Effectiveness Threshold.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- A Framework for Considering the Role of the Public Sector in R&D of Health Technology.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Value-Based Indication-Specific Pricing and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- How can actuarial science contribute to the field of health technology assessment? An interdisciplinary perspective.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Review
- Could or Should We Use Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in the French Value-Based Pricing Process for New Drugs?PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Examining the Effect of Depicting a Patient Affected by a Negative Reimbursement Decision in Healthcare on Public Disagreement with the Decision.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Market Transparency in Medicine Pricing: Pathways to Fair Pricing.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Comment on: A Framework for the Fair Pricing of Medicines.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Reply to Comment on "A Framework for Fair Pricing of Medicines".PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
As high-cost medicines put increasing pressure on public health care budgets, the need to identify 'fair' prices for medicines has never been greater. This paper proposes a framework, built upon fundamental economic principles, that allows for the consideration of 'fair' prices for medicines. The framework incorporates key considerations from conventional supply-side and demand-side approaches for specifying a cost-effectiveness 'threshold', including the health opportunity cost borne by other patients ([Formula: see text]) and society's willingness to pay for marginal improvements in population health ([Formula: see text]). The costs incurred by manufacturers in developing and supplying new medicines are also considered, as are the incentives for manufacturers to strategically price up to any common price per unit of benefit (cost-effectiveness 'threshold') specified by the payer. The framework finds that, at any 'fair' price, a medicine's dynamically calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) lies below [Formula: see text]. When pricing medicines collectively, the framework finds that a common price below [Formula: see text] is required to maximize population health (consumer surplus) or to maximize total welfare (consumer and producer surplus). This framework has important policy implications for payers who wish to improve population health outcomes from constrained health care budgets. In particular, existing approaches to 'value-based pricing' should be reconsidered to ensure that patients receive a 'fair' share of the resulting economic surplus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.