Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066355›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2024

Engineering of Cell Derived-Nanovesicle as an Alternative to Exosome Therapy.

Hye-Jeong Jang, Kyu-Sik Shim, Jinah Lee, Joo Hyeon Park, Seong-Jun Kang, Young Min Shin, Jung Bok Lee, Wooyeol Baek, Jeong-Kee Yoon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hypothalamic wars: the last nanodelivery.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hye-Jeong JangDepartment of Systems Biotechnology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 17546, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Sik ShimDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Jinah LeeDepartment of Biological Science, Research Institute of Women's Health, Brain Korea 21 Project, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea.
Joo Hyeon ParkDepartment of Biological Science, Research Institute of Women's Health, Brain Korea 21 Project, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Jun KangDepartment of Systems Biotechnology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 17546, Republic of Korea.
Young Min ShinDepartment of Biological Science, Research Institute of Women's Health, Brain Korea 21 Project, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea.
Jung Bok LeeDepartment of Biological Science, Research Institute of Women's Health, Brain Korea 21 Project, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea. jungboklee@sookmyung.ac.kr.
Wooyeol BaekDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. parande@yuhs.ac.
Jeong-Kee YoonDepartment of Systems Biotechnology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 17546, Republic of Korea. jyoon342@cau.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-9911
Sookmyung Women's University · KRChung-Ang University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2021K1A3A1A74099704National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2021R1C1C1011015National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2023-00213691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExosomes, nano-sized vesicles ranging between 30 and 150 nm secreted by human cells, play a pivotal role in long-range intercellular communication and have attracted significant attention in the field of regenerative medicine. Nevertheless, their limited productivity and cost-effectiveness pose challenges for clinical applications. These issues have recently been addressed by cell-derived nanovesicles (CDNs), which are physically synthesized exosome-mimetic nanovesicles from parent cells, as a promising alternative to exosomes. CDNs exhibit structural, physical, and biological properties similar to exosomes, containing intracellular protein and genetic components encapsulated by the cell plasma membrane. These characteristics allow CDNs to be used as regenerative medicine and therapeutics on their own, or as a drug delivery system.

methodsThe paper reviews diverse methods for CDN synthesis, current analysis techniques, and presents engineering strategies to improve lesion targeting efficiency and/or therapeutic efficacy.

resultsCDNs, with their properties similar to those of exosomes, offer a cost-effective and highly productive alternative due to their non-living biomaterial nature, nano-size, and readiness for use, allowing them to overcome several limitations of conventional cell therapy methods.

conclusionOngoing research and enhancement of CDNs engineering, along with comprehensive safety assessments and stability analysis, exhibit vast potential to advance regenerative medicine by enabling the development of efficient therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

ExosomesDrug Delivery SystemsHumansRegenerative MedicineCell-derived nanovesiclesDrug deliveryExosomesRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID38066355
PMCPMC10764700
OpenAlexW4389475525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.