Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066335›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2024

How chemokines organize the tumour microenvironment.

Thorsten R Mempel, Julia K Lill, Lukas M Altenburger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
178citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
47.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

178 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Overcoming Drug Resistance by Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. ALNCR.TNM as a Novel Prognostic Tool for Cancer Survival.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A pathogenic CD8⁺ TNature communications · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thorsten R MempelCenter for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tmempel@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8635-5424
Julia K LillCenter for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lukas M AltenburgerCenter for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · US

Funding

Strategies to Overcome Immune Resistance in Head and Neck CancersP01CA240239 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SARTOR, MAUREEN AGNES · 2019 to 2023
$8.4M
The power of extracellular vesicles in glioblastomaR35CA232103 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BREAKEFIELD, XANDRA OWENS · 2018 to 2024
$6.9M
Cellular mechanisms by which exhausted T cell responses are restoredR01AI123349 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Thorsten Roman Mempel · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
A mechanism to minimize auto-reactivity in the tissue-resident memory T cell poolR01AI163223 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEMPEL, THORSTEN ROMAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
Cue-101 and TCR-T cell Combinatorial Strategy for HPV+ Head and Neck CancersR01CA278212 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sara Isabel Pai · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA240239NCI NIH HHS R01 CA278212NCI NIH HHS R35 CA232103NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123349NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI163223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For our immune system to contain or eliminate malignant solid tumours, both myeloid and lymphoid haematopoietic cells must not only extravasate from the bloodstream into the tumour tissue but also further migrate to various specialized niches of the tumour microenvironment to functionally interact with each other, with non-haematopoietic stromal cells and, ultimately, with cancer cells. These interactions regulate local immune cell survival, proliferative expansion, differentiation and their execution of pro-tumour or antitumour effector functions, which collectively determine the outcome of spontaneous or therapeutically induced antitumour immune responses. None of these interactions occur randomly but are orchestrated and critically depend on migratory guidance cues provided by chemokines, a large family of chemotactic cytokines, and their receptors. Understanding the functional organization of the tumour immune microenvironment inevitably requires knowledge of the multifaceted roles of chemokines in the recruitment and positioning of its cellular constituents. Gaining such knowledge will not only generate new insights into the mechanisms underlying antitumour immunity or immune tolerance but also inform the development of biomarkers (or 'biopatterns') based on spatial tumour tissue analyses, as well as novel strategies to therapeutically engineer immune responses in patients with cancer. Here we will discuss recent observations on the role of chemokines in the tumour microenvironment in the context of our knowledge of their physiological functions in development, homeostasis and antimicrobial responses.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentChemokinesHumansImmune SystemImmune ToleranceChemokines

Identifiers

PMID38066335
PMCPMC11480775
OpenAlexW4389478442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.