Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066227›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

From active treatment to surveillance: how the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients.

Jennifer Alford-Teaster, Danielle Vaclavik, Inger Imset, Jenna Schiffelbein, Kathleen Lyons, Nirav Kapadia, Ardis Olson, Elizabeth B McGrath, Karen Schifferdecker, Tracy Onega

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acceptability of a practical geriatric assessment intervention with older adult cancer survivors and community health workers/promotoras: a qualitative investigation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Alford-TeasterDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. Jennifer.A.Alford-Teaster@dartmouth.edu.
Danielle VaclavikCenter for Program Design and Evaluation (CPDE) at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (TDI), Lebanon, NH, USA.
Inger ImsetPopulation Health, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Jenna SchiffelbeinDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Kathleen LyonsMGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
Nirav KapadiaDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Ardis OlsonDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Elizabeth B McGrathDartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Karen SchifferdeckerCenter for Program Design and Evaluation (CPDE) at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (TDI), Lebanon, NH, USA.
Tracy OnegaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Dartmouth Cancer CenterDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USDartmouth Psychiatric Research Center · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery, and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of (a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, (b) a broader survey of clinicians, and (c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors.

resultsResults from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely (1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care, (2) lack of mental health services, (3) lack of side effect education, (4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans, (5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect, and (6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors' access to telehealth options.

conclusionsOur results suggest that telehealth has the potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningSurvivorshipTelemedicineAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesVermontSurvivorshipTelehealthTele-oncology

Identifiers

PMID38066227
OpenAlexW4389491071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.