ArticleScientific reports2023
A structural approach to detecting opinion leaders in Twitter by random matrix theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public Versus Academic Discourse on ChatGPT in Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach leveraging Random Matrix Theory (RMT) to identify influential users and uncover the underlying dynamics within social media discourse networks. Focusing on the retweet network associated with the 2021 Iranian presidential election, our study reveals intriguing findings. RMT analysis unveils that power dynamics within both poles of the network do not conform to a "one-to-many" pattern, highlighting a select group of users wielding significant influence within their clusters and across the entire network. By harnessing Random Matrix Theory (RMT) and complementary methodologies, we gain a profound understanding of the network's structure and, in turn, unveil the intricate dynamics of the discussion extending beyond mere structural analysis. In sum, our findings underscore the potential of RMT as a tool to gain deeper insights into network dynamics, particularly within popular discussions. This approach holds promise for investigating opinion leaders in diverse political and non-political dialogues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.