Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066189›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine-learning guided Venom Induced Dermonecrosis Analysis tooL: VIDAL.

William Laprade, Keirah E Bartlett, Charlotte R Christensen, Taline D Kazandjian, Rohit N Patel, Edouard Crittenden, Charlotte A Dawson, Marjan Mansourvar, Darian S Wolff, Thomas Fryer and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Editorial: venom collection.Scientific reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Research square · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

William LapradeDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Keirah E BartlettCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Charlotte R ChristensenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Taline D KazandjianCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Rohit N PatelCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Edouard CrittendenCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Charlotte A DawsonCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Marjan MansourvarDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Darian S WolffDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Thomas FryerDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Andreas H LaustsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Nicholas R CasewellCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
José María GutiérrezInstituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Steven R HallCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Steven.Hall@lstmed.ac.uk.
Timothy P JenkinsDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. tpaje@dtu.dk.
Technical University of Denmark · DKLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLancaster University · GBUniversidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15040Medical Research Council MR/S00016X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 221712/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming is a global public health issue that causes significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in low-income regions of the world. The clinical manifestations of envenomings vary depending on the snake's venom, with paralysis, haemorrhage, and necrosis being the most common and medically relevant effects. To assess the efficacy of antivenoms against dermonecrosis, a preclinical testing approach involves in vivo mouse models that mimic local tissue effects of cytotoxic snakebites in humans. However, current methods for assessing necrosis severity are time-consuming and susceptible to human error. To address this, we present the Venom Induced Dermonecrosis Analysis tooL (VIDAL), a machine-learning-guided image-based solution that can automatically identify dermonecrotic lesions in mice, adjust for lighting biases, scale the image, extract lesion area and discolouration, and calculate the severity of dermonecrosis. We also introduce a new unit, the dermonecrotic unit (DnU), to better capture the complexity of dermonecrosis severity. Our tool is comparable to the performance of state-of-the-art histopathological analysis, making it an accessible, accurate, and reproducible method for assessing dermonecrosis in mice. Given the urgent need to address the neglected tropical disease that is snakebite, high-throughput technologies such as VIDAL are crucial in developing and validating new and existing therapeutics for this debilitating disease.

Indexed as

Snake BitesVenomsAnimalsAntiveninsGlobal HealthHumansMiceNecrosisAntiveninsVenoms

Identifiers

PMID38066189
PMCPMC10709447
OpenAlexW4389481597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.