ArticleScientific reports2023
Diagnosing lagophthalmos using artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological Integration in Aesthetic Practice: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality and Robotics in Cosmetic Procedures.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnosing facial synkinesis using artificial intelligence to advance facial palsy care.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hierarchical attention transformer provides assistant suggestions for orbital rejuvenation surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Examining timing of periorbital interventions in patients with upper division facial paralysis.Head & neck · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery, where do we stand?JPRAS open · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Indocyanine Green Lymphography Pattern Classification for Management of Lymphatic Disease.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- In-depth analysis of ChatGPT's performance based on specific signaling words and phrases in the question stem of 2377 USMLE step 1 style questions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lagophthalmos is the incomplete closure of the eyelids posing the risk of corneal ulceration and blindness. Lagophthalmos is a common symptom of various pathologies. We aimed to program a convolutional neural network to automatize lagophthalmos diagnosis. From June 2019 to May 2021, prospective data acquisition was performed on 30 patients seen at the Department of Plastic, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany (IRB reference number: 20-2081-101). In addition, comparative data were gathered from 10 healthy patients as the control group. The training set comprised 826 images, while the validation and testing sets consisted of 91 patient images each. Validation accuracy was 97.8% over the span of 64 epochs. The model was trained for 17.3 min. For training and validation, an average loss of 0.304 and 0.358 and a final loss of 0.276 and 0.157 were noted. The testing accuracy was observed to be 93.41% with a loss of 0.221. This study proposes a novel application for rapid and reliable lagophthalmos diagnosis. Our CNN-based approach combines effective anti-overfitting strategies, short training times, and high accuracy levels. Ultimately, this tool carries high translational potential to facilitate the physician's workflow and improve overall lagophthalmos patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.