ArticleScientific reports2023
Distal oblique bundle influence on distal radioulnar joint stability: a biomechanical study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Bone and Ligamentous Reconstruction of the Distal Radius After Oncologic Resection: Proximal Fibular Autograft Combined with Distal Oblique Bundle Reconstruction.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distal Oblique Bundle and Membranous Thickening: Morphology and Integration with the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predictors of limited forearm rotation following conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a retrospective comparative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) presents a highly disabling condition. Several surgical techniques have been reported for its treatment. These involve reconstruction of the distal oblique bundle (DOB) of the interosseous membrane (IOM) of the forearm. The aim of this study was to examine whether surgical reconstruction of the DOB is necessary to restore DRUJ stability following trauma with DOB disruption and to compare two restoration techniques utilizing a tendon or suture-button graft. Stability in supination and pronation was assessed by means of maximum torque and force in twenty forearms. Test cycles were performed with the DOB/IOM in an intact condition, with the DOB or distal IOM transected, and following surgical reconstruction of the DOB with either tendon graft or suture-button system. In pronation, the relative change in maximum axial force was significantly lower in samples with a transected DOB in comparison to samples without a preexisting DOB. No statistically significant differences were observed between forearms including DOB reconstruction and specimens in the intact and transected state. Neither were there statistically significant differences concerning the two surgical techniques. From a biomechanical perspective, surgical DOB reconstruction is hence not indicated in cases of isolated DOB rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.