Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066010›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Model-based deep learning framework for accelerated optical projection tomography.

Marcos Obando, Andrea Bassi, Nicolas Ducros, Germán Mato, Teresa M Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcos ObandoMedical Physics Department, Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro, 8400, Bariloche, Argentina.
Andrea BassiDipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133, Milano, Italy.
Nicolas DucrosUniversity of Lyon INSA-Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, UJM Saint-Etienne, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220, Inserm, U1294, Lyon, France.
Germán Mato *Medical Physics Department, Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro, 8400, Bariloche, Argentina.
Teresa M Correia *Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal. tmcorreia@ualg.pt.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we propose a model-based deep learning reconstruction algorithm for optical projection tomography (ToMoDL), to greatly reduce acquisition and reconstruction times. The proposed method iterates over a data consistency step and an image domain artefact removal step achieved by a convolutional neural network. A preprocessing stage is also included to avoid potential misalignments between the sample center of rotation and the detector. The algorithm is trained using a database of wild-type zebrafish (Danio rerio) at different stages of development to minimise the mean square error for a fixed number of iterations. Using a cross-validation scheme, we compare the results to other reconstruction methods, such as filtered backprojection, compressed sensing and a direct deep learning method where the pseudo-inverse solution is corrected by a U-Net. The proposed method performs equally well or better than the alternatives. For a highly reduced number of projections, only the U-Net method provides images comparable to those obtained with ToMoDL. However, ToMoDL has a much better performance if the amount of data available for training is limited, given that the number of network trainable parameters is smaller.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, ImagingTomographyZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID38066010
PMCPMC10709405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.