ArticleScientific reports2023
Dictionary-based matching graph network for biomedical named entity recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Identification of Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions From Nursing Records Using a Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Approach: Quantitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- I-NOWJ: adaptive context selection and knowledge-guided learning for substance use named entity recognition.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Introducing mCODEGPT as a zero-shot information extraction from clinical free text data tool for cancer research.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Psychomedical named entity recognition method based on multi-level feature extraction and multi-granularity embedding fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical named entity recognition (BioNER) is an essential task in biomedical information analysis. Recently, deep neural approaches have become widely utilized for BioNER. Biomedical dictionaries, implemented through a masked manner, are frequently employed in these methods to enhance entity recognition. However, their performance remains limited. In this work, we propose a dictionary-based matching graph network for BioNER. This approach utilizes the matching graph method to project all possible dictionary-based entity combinations in the text onto a directional graph. The network is implemented coherently with a bi-directional graph convolutional network (BiGCN) that incorporates the matching graph information. Our proposed approach fully leverages the dictionary-based matching graph instead of a simple masked manner. We have conducted numerous experiments on five typical Bio-NER datasets. The proposed model shows significant improvements in F1 score compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models: 2.8% on BC2GM, 1.3% on BC4CHEMD, 1.1% on BC5CDR, 1.6% on NCBI-disease, and 0.5% on JNLPBA. The results show that our model, which is superior to other models, can effectively recognize natural biomedical named entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.