Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38065953›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Alkali metal reduction of alkali metal cations.

Kyle G Pearce, Han-Ying Liu, Samuel E Neale, Hattie M Goff, Mary F Mahon, Claire L McMullin, Michael S Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tin-Tin π Bonding as a Conduit for Alkali-Metal Reduction.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. An Alumanyl Test Case of Group 1 Redox Interchange.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Borates expand their reduction power.Communications chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. [{SiNOrganometallics · 2024
    Article
  8. Reduction of LiNature communications · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyle G PearceDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-4483
Han-Ying LiuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8686-5243
Samuel E NealeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-9594
Hattie M GoffDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Mary F MahonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Claire L McMullinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. cm2025@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-2890
Michael S HillDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. msh27@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9649

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/X01181X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counter to synthetic convention and expectation provided by the relevant standard reduction potentials, the chloroberyllate, [{SiN

Identifiers

PMID38065953
PMCPMC10709313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.