Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38065941›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Crop rotation and native microbiome inoculation restore soil capacity to suppress a root disease.

Yanyan Zhou, Zhen Yang, Jinguang Liu, Xudong Li, Xingxiang Wang, Chuanchao Dai, Taolin Zhang, Víctor J Carrión, Zhong Wei, Fuliang Cao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Field Root-Associated Microbiome Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. High bacterial diversity drives the suppression of a soilborne plant disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yanyan Zhou *State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-9388
Zhen Yang *State Key Laboratory of Soil & Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Jinguang LiuState Key Laboratory of Soil & Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Xudong LiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Xingxiang WangState Key Laboratory of Soil & Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-5612
Chuanchao DaiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Microbes and Functional Genomics, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0980-0018
Taolin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Soil & Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Víctor J CarriónDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Universitario de Teatinos s/n, Universidad de Málaga, 29010, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4093-0355
Zhong WeiCollege of Resources and Environmental Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-4897
Fuliang CaoCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Manuel Delgado-BaquerizoLaboratorio de Biodiversidad y Funcionamiento Ecosistémico, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla (IRNAS), CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-576X
Xiaogang LiState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. xgli@njfu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-1122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely known that some soils have strong levels of disease suppression and prevent the establishment of pathogens in the rhizosphere of plants. However, what soils are better suppressing disease, and how management can help us to boost disease suppression remain unclear. Here, we used field, greenhouse and laboratory experiments to investigate the effect of management (monocropping and rotation) on the capacity of rhizosphere microbiomes in suppressing peanut root rot disease. Compared with crop rotations, monocropping resulted in microbial assemblies that were less effective in suppressing root rot diseases. Further, the depletion of key rhizosphere taxa in monocropping, which were at a disadvantage in the competition for limited exudates resources, reduced capacity to protect plants against pathogen invasion. However, the supplementation of depleted strains restored rhizosphere resistance to pathogen. Taken together, our findings highlight the role of native soil microbes in fighting disease and supporting plant health, and indicate the potential of using microbial inocula to regenerate the natural capacity of soil to fight disease.

Indexed as

FabaceaeMicrobiotaArachisCrop ProductionPlant RootsRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologySoil

Identifiers

PMID38065941
PMCPMC10709580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.