Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38065588›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2023

Cardiac dysfunction in survivors of sepsis: a scoping review.

Kevin Garrity, Samantha Gaw, Alice Blewitt, Paul Canon, Philip McCall, Joanne McPeake

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin GarrityUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK kevin.garrity@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1037-3201
Samantha GawNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Alice BlewittNHS Ayrshire and Arran, Kilmarnock, UK.
Paul CanonUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Philip McCallUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Joanne McPeakeUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBGolden Jubilee National Hospital · GBNHS Ayrshire and Arran · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events in a magnitude comparable to other major cardiovascular risk factors. Sepsis is one of the most common reasons for intensive care admission and survivors often have significant functional limitations following discharge. However, it is not clear to what extent chronic cardiovascular dysfunction might mediate these functional impairments, or how we might screen and manage these patients at risk of chronic cardiovascular disease. We conducted a scoping review to map existing evidence and identify research gaps relating to cardiovascular dysfunction following sepsis.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases using a concept, context, population (CoCoPop) framework. Studies examining cardiovascular outcomes or symptoms following an episode of sepsis in adults were included. Data were mapped based on the population assessed, cardiovascular outcomes examined, inclusion of objective measures of cardiac dysfunction such as biomarkers or cardiovascular imaging, or whether cardiovascular symptoms or patient-reported functional outcomes measures were recorded.

resultsWe identified 11 210 articles of which 70 were eligible for full text review and 28 were included in final analysis. Across our dataset, a wide range of incident cardiovascular outcomes were reported in the literature including incidence of congestive heart failure (13/28), arrhythmia (6/28), myocardial infarction (24/28) or cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality (20/28). Only 39% (11/28) of articles reported objective measures of cardiovascular function and only one article related cardiovascular function to functional impairment via patient-reported outcome measures.

conclusionThere are significant gaps in our understanding of cardiac dysfunction following sepsis . While the research highlights the strong association of sepsis with a variety of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, further prospective work is required to understand the mechanisms that mediate this phenomenon and how we can best identify and manage patients at risk.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionSepsisAdultArrhythmias, CardiacHospitalizationHumansSurvivorsbiomarkerscardiac imaging techniquesheart failureoutcome assessment, health carerisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38065588
PMCPMC10711866
OpenAlexW4389485376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.