Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38064507›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Effort Foraging Task reveals positive correlation between individual differences in the cost of cognitive and physical effort in humans.

Laura A Bustamante, Temitope Oshinowo, Jeremy R Lee, Elizabeth Tong, Allison R Burton, Amitai Shenhav, Jonathan D Cohen, Nathaniel D Daw

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The cognitive and motor determinants of the perception of effort.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Decision context and neurobehavioural disturbance in Huntington's disease.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of physical effort on temporal processing.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Day-to-day fluctuations in motivation drive effort-based decision-making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Mechanisms of Information-Seeking in Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Predecisional information search adaptively reduces three types of uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Generalized Encoding of the Relative Subjective Value of Cognitive Effort in the Dorsal ACC.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A BustamantePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-2539-0602
Temitope OshinowoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0001-6764-3316
Jeremy R LeePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Elizabeth TongPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-8081-1887
Allison R BurtonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Amitai ShenhavDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-0774
Jonathan D CohenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-2316-0763
Nathaniel D DawPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-1430
Princeton University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSET32DA007261 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ARPANA AGRAWAL, Jose A Moron-Concepcion · 1991 to 2026
$8.8M
NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Neural and computational mechanisms of motivation and cognitive controlR01MH124849 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SHENHAV, AMITAI · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007261NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124849NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effort-based decisions, in which people weigh potential future rewards against effort costs required to achieve those rewards involve both cognitive and physical effort, though the mechanistic relationship between them is not yet understood. Here, we use an individual differences approach to isolate and measure the computational processes underlying effort-based decisions and test the association between cognitive and physical domains. Patch foraging is an ecologically valid reward rate maximization problem with well-developed theoretical tools. We developed the Effort Foraging Task, which embedded cognitive or physical effort into patch foraging, to quantify the cost of both cognitive and physical effort indirectly, by their effects on foraging choices. Participants chose between harvesting a depleting patch, or traveling to a new patch that was costly in time and effort. Participants' exit thresholds (reflecting the reward they expected to receive by harvesting when they chose to travel to a new patch) were sensitive to cognitive and physical effort demands, allowing us to quantify the perceived effort cost in monetary terms. The indirect sequential choice style revealed effort-seeking behavior in a minority of participants (preferring high over low effort) that has apparently been missed by many previous approaches. Individual differences in cognitive and physical effort costs were positively correlated, suggesting that these are perceived and processed in common. We used canonical correlation analysis to probe the relationship of task measures to self-reported affect and motivation, and found correlations of cognitive effort with anxiety, cognitive function, behavioral activation, and self-efficacy, but no similar correlations with physical effort.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPhysical ExertionCognitionHumansIndividualityMotivationRewardcognitive controlcomputational psychiatryeffort-based decision-makingforagingmotivation

Identifiers

PMID38064507
PMCPMC10723129
OpenAlexW4389475442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.