Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38064486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Antimicrobial use practices in canine and feline dental procedures performed in primary care veterinary practices in the United States.

J Scott Weese, Ian Battersby, JoAnn Morrison, Nathaniel Spofford, Maria Soltero-Rivera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 2025 FelineVMA feline oral health and dental care guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial susceptibility ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  10. Characterization of Oxacillin-Resistant and Oxacillin-SusceptibleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J Scott WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Ian BattersbyMars Veterinary Health, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
JoAnn MorrisonBanfield Pet Hospital, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
Nathaniel SpoffordBanfield Pet Hospital, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
Maria Soltero-RiveraDepartment of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-3966
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the utilization of antimicrobials in canines and felines receiving dental treatments in veterinary clinics in the United States, retrospectively. A total of 818,150 animals (713,901 procedures in dogs and 104,249 procedures in cats) underwent dental procedures under general anesthesia in 2020. These included dental prophylaxis and extractions. Patient demographic data, antimicrobial treatment, treatment duration, dose, periodontal disease score, whether tooth extractions were performed and how many extractions were performed was recorded. Our results showed that local or systemic antimicrobials were used in 116,723/713,901 (16.4%) procedures in dogs and 14,264/104,249 (14%) procedures in cats. Age, weight, extraction of one or more teeth and diagnosis of periodontal disease (any stage) were associated with increased likelihood of antimicrobial administration using univariable analysis (all P<0.001) and in the multivariable model. Clindamycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and amoxicillin were the most common oral antimicrobials used in dogs and cats. Drugs classified as highest priority clinically important antibiotics (HPCIA) were administered to 30,960/116,723 (26.5%) of dogs and 7,469/14,264 (52%) of treated cats. The results obtained can inform interventions to optimize patient care and promote prudent use of antimicrobials during dental procedures in canine and feline patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCat DiseasesDog DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesAmoxicillinAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsDogsHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesTooth ExtractionUnited StatesAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID38064486
PMCPMC10707603
OpenAlexW4389475211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.