Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38064227›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2023

The role of texture summary statistics in material recognition from drawings and photographs.

Benjamin Balas, Michelle R Greene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Peripheral material perception.Journal of vision · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin BalasPsychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
Michelle R GreenePsychology Department, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Material depictions in artwork are useful tools for revealing image features that support material categorization. For example, artistic recipes for drawing specific materials make explicit the critical information leading to recognizable material properties (Di Cicco, Wjintjes, & Pont, 2020) and investigating the recognizability of material renderings as a function of their visual features supports conclusions about the vocabulary of material perception. Here, we examined how the recognition of materials from photographs and drawings was affected by the application of the Portilla-Simoncelli texture synthesis model. This manipulation allowed us to examine how categorization may be affected differently across materials and image formats when only summary statistic information about appearance was retained. Further, we compared human performance to the categorization accuracy obtained from a pretrained deep convolutional neural network to determine if observers' performance was reflected in the network. Although we found some similarities between human and network performance for photographic images, the results obtained from drawings differed substantially. Our results demonstrate that texture statistics play a variable role in material categorization across rendering formats and material categories and that the human perception of material drawings is not effectively captured by deep convolutional neural networks trained for object recognition.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID38064227
PMCPMC10709799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.