Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38064169›Full record

ArticleCurrent nutrition reports2023

A Scoping Review of Studies Evaluating the Healthiness of Street Food Vendors.

Sadika Akhter, Adrian J Cameron

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current nutrition reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sadika AkhterGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Deakin University Institute for Health Transformation, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3125, Australia. sadika.akhter@deakin.edu.au.
Adrian J CameronGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Deakin University Institute for Health Transformation, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3125, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis scoping review investigates the available tools for monitoring the healthiness of the food sold at street food outlets globally. RECENT

findingsSeveral tools were identified that have been used to evaluate the healthiness of street food outlets; however, these tools are not applicable globally, do not provide simple measures for evaluating the healthiness of foods sold, and generally have not been used across more than one study. The development of a comprehensive tool for measuring the healthiness of the street food environment that can be used across different jurisdictions and with different levels of resourcing is essential in order to understand the current street food environment and how it changes over time. As a major source of food in low- and middle-income countries globally, the street food environment is important to understand in order to know how it might help address the growing burden of diet-related diseases.

Indexed as

DietFoodHumansFood environmentHealthfulness of street foodInformal food environmentReady-to-eat foodScoping reviewStreet foodStreet food assessment tool

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.