ArticlePediatric surgery international2023
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR): the benefit of the double stitch in the largest single-center experience.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Perspectives on the Contralateral Patent Processus Vaginalis: What About the Other Side?Cureus · 2026Review
- Impact of Surgical Timing on Outcomes in Neonatal Inguinal Hernia Repairs: A Systematic Review.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
- Modifications of surgical techniques in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal ring for childhood inguinal hernia to achieve zero recurrence and zero subcutaneous stitch granuloma.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Commentary on "Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR): the benefit of the double stitch in the largest single-center experience".Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo review our experience of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) regarding complication rates, the practice of closing the asymptomatic patent processes vaginalis (PPV), and comparison of complication rates between pre-term (< 37 week gestation) and term infants.
methodsRetrospective review of LIHR performed between 2009 and 2021. Repair was performed by intracorporal single or double purse string/purse string + Z-stitch using a non-absorbable suture. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared/Mann-Whitney and are quoted as median (range).
results1855 inguinal rings were closed in 1195 patients (943 (79%) male). 1378 rings (74%) were symptomatic. 492 (41%) patients were pre-term. Corrected gestational age at surgery was 55 weeks (31 weeks-14.6 years) and weight 5.9 kg (1-65.5). Closure of contralateral PPV was higher in the premature group (210/397 [53%] vs. 265/613 [43%] p = 0.003). There were 23 recurrences in 20 patients, of whom 10 had been born prematurely. The only factor significantly associated with a lower recurrence was use of a second stitch (p = 0.011).
conclusionThis is the largest single-center reported series of LIHR. LIHR is safe at any age, the risk of recurrence is low, and can be corrected by re-laparoscopy. Use of a Z-stitch or second purse string is associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.