ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Identification of discriminatory factors and construction of nomograms for differentiating AOSD and sepsis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop nomogram prediction models to differentiate between adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) and sepsis.
methodsWe retrospectively collected laboratory test data from 107 hospitalized patients with AOSD and sepsis at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to develop nomogram models using arthralgia, WBC, APTT, creatinine, PLT, and ferritin as independent factors. The performance of the model was evaluated by the bootstrap consistency index and calibration curve.
resultsModel 1 had an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00), specificity of 0.98, and sensitivity of 0.94. Model 2 had an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00), specificity of 0.92, and sensitivity of 0.94. The fivefold cross-validation yielded an accuracy (ACC) of 0.92 and a kappa coefficient of 0.83 for Model 1, while for Model 2, the ACC was 0.87 and the kappa coefficient was 0.74.
conclusionThe nomogram models developed in this study are useful tools for differentiating between AOSD and sepsis. Key Points • The differential diagnosis between AOSD and sepsis has always been a challenge • Delayed treatment of AOSD may lead to serious complications • We developed two nomogram models to distinguish AOSD from sepsis, which were not previously reported • Our models can be used to guide clinical practice with good discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.