Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063918›Full record

ArticlePlanta2023

Multi-locus genome-wide association study and genomic prediction for flowering time in chrysanthemum.

Jiangshuo Su, Zhaowen Lu, Junwei Zeng, Xuefeng Zhang, Xiuwei Yang, Siyue Wang, Fei Zhang, Jiafu Jiang, Fadi Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiangshuo SuState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zhaowen LuState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Junwei ZengState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xuefeng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiuwei YangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Siyue WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Fei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jiafu JiangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Fadi ChenState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Biology of Ornamental Plants in East China, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang No. 1, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. chenfd@njau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9134-2353
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-23-A18Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund CX(21)2004Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20210395the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M661870the National Science Foundation of China 32102421the National Science Foundation of China 32230098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionMulti-locus GWAS detected several known and candidate genes responsible for flowering time in chrysanthemum. The associations could greatly increase the predictive ability of genome selection that accelerates the possible application of GS in chrysanthemum breeding. Timely flowering is critical for successful reproduction and determines the economic value for ornamental plants. To investigate the genetic architecture of flowering time in chrysanthemum, a multi-locus genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using a collection of 200 accessions and 330,710 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) via 3VmrMLM method. Five flowering time traits including budding (FBD), visible colouring (VC), early opening (EO), full-bloom (OF) and senescing (SF) stages, plus five derived conditional traits were recorded in two environments. Extensive phenotypic variations were observed for these flowering time traits with coefficients of variation ranging from 6.42 to 38.27%, and their broad-sense heritability ranged from 71.47 to 96.78%. GWAS revealed 88 stable quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs) and 93 QTN-by-environment interactions (QEIs) associated with flowering time traits, accounting for 0.50-8.01% and 0.30-10.42% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. Amongst the genes around these stable QTNs and QEIs, 21 and 10 were homologous to known flowering genes in Arabidopsis; 20 and 11 candidate genes were mined by combining the functional annotation and transcriptomics data, respectively, such as MYB55, FRIGIDA-like, WRKY75 and ANT. Furthermore, genomic selection (GS) was assessed using three models and seven unique marker datasets. We found the prediction accuracy (PA) using significant SNPs identified by GWAS under SVM model exhibited the best performance with PA ranging from 0.90 to 0.95. Our findings provide new insights into the dynamic genetic architecture of flowering time and the identified significant SNPs and candidate genes will accelerate the future molecular improvement of chrysanthemum.

Indexed as

ChrysanthemumGenome-Wide Association StudyChromosome MappingGenomicsPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproductionChrysanthemumFlowering timeGenetic architectureGenome selectionGWASQEI

Identifiers

PMID38063918
OpenAlexW4389488664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.