ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2023
E7-Conjugated Bio-Inspired Microspheres as a Biological Barrier for Guided Tissue Regeneration.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular matrix-mimic nanofibrous microspheres: fabrication and application in stem cell delivery for tissue repair and regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Assembly of bioinspired multifunctional microspheres for enhanced alveolar bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Pre-chelated gallium-loaded polydopamine nanoparticles as a multifunctional regulator of osteoblast/osteoclastogenesis for the synergistic therapy of periodontitis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR), which is based on creating a physical barrier to prevent the downgrowth of epithelial and connective tissues into the defect site, has been widely used in clinical practice for periodontal regeneration for many years. However, its outcomes remain variable due to highly specific indications, the demand for proficient surgical skills, and frequent occurrence of complications. In this study, we developed a new GTR biomaterial that acts as a biological barrier for epithelial cells and fibroblasts while also serving as a scaffold for bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs). This innovative GTR biomaterial is bioinspired injectable microspheres that are self-assembled from nanofibers, and their surfaces are conjugated with E7, a short peptide that selectively promotes BMSC and PDLSC adhesion but inhibits the attachment and spreading of epithelial cells and gingival fibroblasts. The selective affinity afforded by E7 on the surfaces of the nanofibrous microspheres facilitated the colonization of BMSCs in the periodontal defect, thereby substantially improving functional periodontal regeneration, as evidenced by enhanced new bone formation, reduced root exposure, and diminished attachment loss. The remarkable superiority of the bioinspired microspheres over conventional GTR materials in promoting periodontal regeneration underscores the potential of this innovative approach to enhance the efficacy of functional periodontal tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.