Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063623›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Technology-Assisted Upper Limb Therapy (TAULT): Evaluation of Clinical Practice at a Specialised Centre for Spinal Cord Injury in Switzerland.

Daniela B Kuchen, Beatrice Hubacher, Andris Ladner, Inge-Marie Velstra, Mario Widmer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06775925 (Robot-assisted vs. Conventional Occupational Therapy of the Upper Limb in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06775925 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Robot-assisted vs. Conventional Occupational Therapy of the Upper Limb in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: The Armeo X-over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsCervical Spinal Cord InjuryArmsUnilateral robot-assisted therapy (RT), Unilateral conventional occupational therapy (OT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela B KuchenNeuro-Musculoskeletal Functioning and Mobility, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3255-0966
Beatrice HubacherDepartment of Therapy, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Andris LadnerDepartment of Therapy, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.
Inge-Marie VelstraClinical Trial Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3162-648X
Mario WidmerNeuro-Musculoskeletal Functioning and Mobility, Swiss Paraplegic Research, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-123X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Improving upper limb function is essential for people with tetraplegia. Although promising, technology-assisted upper limb training is understudied in this population. This article describes its implementation in a Swiss spinal cord injury rehabilitation centre and reports on the observed changes. (2) A retrospective evaluation of clinical data from January 2018 to June 2020 examined patient characteristics, training parameters, goal-setting practices, goal achievement, and changes in muscle strength over the course of technology-assisted upper limb training. (3) Data analysis included 61 individuals, 68.9% of whom had a spinal cord injury. The ArmeoSpring was the most frequently used device. The typical treatment regimen was three 25 min sessions per week, with evaluations approximately every six weeks. The 1:1 sessions, delivered by specialised staff, focused primarily on improving shoulder movement and the ability to eat and drink. Functional goals were set using a grid. Performance on selected goals in the areas of 'body functions' and 'activities & participation' as well as muscle strength, increased over the course of training. (4) The ArmeoSpring has broad applicability. Despite the observed improvements, the isolated effect of technology-assisted upper limb training cannot be concluded due to the lack of a control group and various concurrent interventions.

Indexed as

goal settingrehabilitationroboticstetraplegiaupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38063623
PMCPMC10706039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.