ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Preliminary Insights into the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Arm Care Screen Test for Overhead Athletes: An On-Field Tool for Injury Prevention.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Injuries and Persistent Pain in Elite Adolescent Archery Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Arm Care Screen was developed to detect musculoskeletal limitations that could affect performance or even increase the risk for shoulder injuries in overhead athletes. This study aimed to assess the discriminant validity of the modified Arm Care Screen in overhead athletes.
methodsSixty-two overhead athletes (mean age: 24.5 ± 4.2 years) were recruited. The athletes underwent a comprehensive Arm Care Screen evaluation, including reciprocal shoulder mobility, total body rotation, lower body diagonal reach, and rotary stability assessments. Ten different musculoskeletal measurements were independently measured by two physical therapists.
resultsThe modified Arm Care Screen showed moderate to strong associations (phi values ranged from 0.273 to 0.905) with the respective musculoskeletal range of motion and balance measurements. Sensitivity ranged from 81.25% to 88.57%, indicating a high true positive rate, and specificity ranged from 43.75% to 94.44%, indicating a moderate to strong positive rate. Positive and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 1.48 to 15.92 and 0.12 to 0.38, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value ranged from 58.14% to 92% and from 73.68% to 93.18%, respectively. The accuracy of the modified ACS ranged from 62.90% to 91.94%.
conclusionThe modified Arm Care Screen demonstrated promising diagnostic accuracy in identifying significant movement restrictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.