Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063572›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2024

Defining the Time-limited Trial for Patients with Critical Illness: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Jacqueline M Kruser, Deepshikha C Ashana, Katherine R Courtright, Erin K Kross, Thanh H Neville, Eileen Rubin, Yael Schenker, Donald R Sullivan, J Daryl Thornton, Elizabeth M Viglianti and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Surviving Severe Acute Brain injury: Care trajectories and missed opportunities.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. ICU communication: 'state of the art'.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. [Specialized geriatric care in intensive care units: from frailty to functional prognosis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 19 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline M KruserORCID 0000-0003-3258-1869
Deepshikha C AshanaORCID 0000-0003-2107-2110
Katherine R CourtrightORCID 0000-0003-3572-9857
Eileen Rubin
Donald R SullivanORCID 0000-0003-3266-3389
Elizabeth M VigliantiORCID 0000-0002-7439-6322
Deena Kelly CostaORCID 0000-0002-7776-5349
Claire J Creutzfeldt
Michael E Detsky
Heidi J Engel
Neera Grover
Aluko A Hope
Jason N Katz
Andrew G Miller
Michael J NaboznyORCID 0000-0003-1735-6356
Hasan Shanawani
Jennifer P Stevens
Alison E TurnbullORCID 0000-0002-1564-6547
Christopher E CoxORCID 0000-0002-4486-0681
Duke University · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMichigan United · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USSan Francisco Foundation · USSinai Health System · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USYale University · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Northern Ohio, Catalyzing Linkages to Equity in Health (CLE Health)UM1TR004528 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRACE A MCCOMSEY · 2023 to 2026
$32.1M
Using Lay Health Advisors to Help African American Patients Address the Social Context of HypertensionU54MD002265 · NIMHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SEHGAL, ASHWINI · 2017 to 2021
$7.1M
Cognitive Motor Interference Assessment for Improving Neurologic and Physical Disability Outcomes in Survivors of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (CAMINANDO) Phase IIK01HL140279 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HOPE, ALUKO A. · 2018 to 2022
$885k
CHANGE OF GRANTEE INSTITUTION K23 HL146890 A Systems Approach to Align ICU Care with Patient Treatment GoalsK23HL146890 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KRUSER, JACQUELINE MARIE · 2019 to 2023
$877k
Racial disparities in shared decision making for patients with acute respiratory failureK23HL164968 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Deepshikha Charan Ashana · 2022 to 2026
$841k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004528NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL140279NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146890NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL164968NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD002265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In critical care, the specific, structured approach to patient care known as a "time-limited trial" has been promoted in the literature to help patients, surrogate decision makers, and clinicians navigate consequential decisions about life-sustaining therapy in the face of uncertainty. Despite promotion of the time-limited trial approach, a lack of consensus about its definition and essential elements prevents optimal clinical use and rigorous evaluation of its impact. The objectives of this American Thoracic Society Workshop Committee were to establish a consensus definition of a time-limited trial in critical care, identify the essential elements for conducting a time-limited trial, and prioritize directions for future work. We achieved these objectives through a structured search of the literature, a modified Delphi process with 100 interdisciplinary and interprofessional stakeholders, and iterative committee discussions. We conclude that a time-limited trial for patients with critical illness is a collaborative plan among clinicians and a patient and/or their surrogate decision makers to use life-sustaining therapy for a defined duration, after which the patient's response to therapy informs the decision to continue care directed toward recovery, transition to care focused exclusively on comfort, or extend the trial's duration. The plan's 16 essential elements follow four sequential phases: consider, plan, support, and reassess. We acknowledge considerable gaps in evidence about the impact of time-limited trials and highlight a concern that if inadequately implemented, time-limited trials may perpetuate unintended harm. Future work is needed to better implement this defined, specific approach to care in practice through a person-centered equity lens and to evaluate its impact on patients, surrogates, and clinicians.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDecision MakingConsensusCritical CareHumansPatientsUnited Statescritical carelife-sustaining therapypalliative careshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID38063572
PMCPMC10848901
OpenAlexW4389489529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.