Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063560›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Beauty Beware: Associations between Perceptions of Harm and Safer Hair-Product-Purchasing Behaviors in a Cross-Sectional Study of Adults Affiliated with a University in the Northeast.

Cathryn E Payne, Amber Rockson, Adiba Ashrafi, Jasmine A McDonald, Traci N Bethea, Emily S Barrett, Adana A M Llanos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07216898 (You Have the Right to Know), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07216898 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

You Have the Right to Know: Empowering Women Through Clean Beauty Research and Education

TypeobservationalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled38ConditionsHealth Disparities, EducationArmsChemical Exposure Prevention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cathryn E PayneDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Amber RocksonDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Adiba AshrafiDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Jasmine A McDonaldDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-8074
Traci N BetheaLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-2078
Emily S BarrettDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Adana A M LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-9121

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Widespread personal care product (PCP) use can expose individuals to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) associated with adverse health outcomes. This study investigated the association between harm perceptions and hair-product-purchasing behaviors in adults enrolled in a cross-sectional study. (2) Methods: Respondents rated their agreement with five PCP-related harm statements using a five-point Likert scale. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between harm perceptions with hair-product-purchasing behaviors and hair product use (i.e., number of products used). (3) Results: Among 567 respondents (non-Hispanic White, 54.9%; non-Hispanic Black, 9.5%; Hispanic/Latinx, 10.1%; Asian American/Pacific Islander, 20.1%; and multiracial/other, 5.5%), stronger harm perceptions around PCP use were associated with potentially "safer" hair-product-purchasing behaviors. Respondents who strongly agreed that consumers should be concerned about the health effects of PCPs had more than fourfold increased odds of always/usually using healthy product apps (OR 4.10, 95% CI: 2.04-8.26); reading ingredient labels (OR 4.53, 95% CI: 2.99-6.87); and looking for natural, non-toxic, or eco-friendly product labels (OR 4.53, 95% CI: 2.99-6.88) when buying hair products. (4) Conclusions: Promoting environmental health literacy and raising awareness of potential PCP use-related harms might encourage healthier hair product use behaviors.

Indexed as

BeautyCosmeticsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthnicityHumansUniversitiesCosmeticsadultsendocrine-disrupting chemicalshair productsperceptions of harmpersonal care products

Identifiers

PMID38063560
PMCPMC10706836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.