Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063193›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2024

An LGR4 agonist activates the GSK‑3β pathway to inhibit RANK‑RANKL signaling during osteoclastogenesis in bone marrow‑derived macrophages.

Yuria Jang, Hyeonjoon Lee, Yongjin Cho, Eunseo Choi, Suenghwan Jo, Hong Moon Sohn, Beom Chang Kim, Young Jong Ko, Wonbong Lim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of endosomal RANKL-LGR4 signaling during osteoclast differentiation.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuria Jang *Laboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonjoon Lee *Laboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Yongjin ChoLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Eunseo ChoiDepartment of Physics, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Suenghwan JoLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Hong Moon SohnLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Beom Chang KimLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Young Jong KoLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Wonbong LimLaboratory of Orthopedic Research, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Chosun University Hospital · KRChosun University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The binding between receptor‑activated nuclear factor‑κB (RANK) and the RANK ligand (RANKL) during osteoclast development is an important target for drugs that treat osteoporosis. The leucine‑rich repeat‑containing G‑protein‑coupled receptor 4 (LGR4) acts as a negative regulator of RANK‑RANKL that suppresses canonical RANK signaling during osteoclast differentiation. Therefore, LGR4 agonists may be useful in inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and effectively treating osteoporosis. In the present study, bone marrow‑derived macrophages and a mouse model of RANKL‑induced bone loss were used to investigate the effect of mutant RANKL (MT RANKL), which was previously developed based on the crystal structure of the RANKL complex. In the present study, the binding affinity of wild‑type (WT) RANKL and MT RANKL to RANK and LGR4 was determined using microscale thermophoresis analysis, and the effect of the ligands on the AKT‑glycogen synthase kinase‑3β (GSK‑3β)‑nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic, calcineurin‑dependent 1 (NFATc1) signaling cascade was investigated using western blotting and confocal microscopy. In addition, the expression of LGR4 and the colocalization of LGR4 with MT RANKL were analyzed in a mouse model of RANKL‑induced bone loss. The results showed that in osteoclast precursor cells, MT RANKL bound with high affinity to LGR4 and increased GSK‑3β phosphorylation independently of AKT, resulting in the inhibition of NFATc1 nuclear translocation. In the mouse model, MT RANKL colocalized with LGR4 and inhibited bone resorption. These results indicated that MT RANKL may inhibit RANKL‑induced osteoclastogenesis through an LGR4‑dependent pathway and this could be exploited to develop new therapies for osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaOsteoporosisAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedMacrophagesMiceNFATC Transcription FactorsNF-kappa BOsteoclastsOsteogenesisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRANK LigandReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaLGR4 protein, mouseNFATC Transcription FactorsNF-kappa BProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRANK LigandReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledglycogen synthase kinase‑3βleucine‑rich repeat‑containing G‑protein‑coupled receptor 4osteoclastosteoporosisreceptor activator of nuclear factor‑κΒreceptor activator of nuclear factor‑κΒ ligand

Identifiers

PMID38063193
PMCPMC10712694
OpenAlexW4389341478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.