Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38063009›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024

Factors affecting obstetric outcomes in patients who underwent cold-knife and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3

Mehmet Obut, Can Tekin İskender, Aykut Kından, Özge Yücel Çelik, Mevlüt Bucak, Fulya Kayıkçıoğlu, Betül Tokgöz Çakır, Sevgi Koç, Caner Çakır, Şevki Çelen and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehmet ObutDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-6925-4784
Can Tekin İskenderDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1376-5734
Aykut KındanDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0962-1036
Özge Yücel ÇelikDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7746-1943
Mevlüt BucakDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5035-8727
Fulya KayıkçıoğluDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1078-0982
Betül Tokgöz ÇakırDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0202-4981
Sevgi KoçDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1703-0690
Caner ÇakırDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2559-9104
Şevki ÇelenDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-7033-3474
Ali Turhan ÇağlarDepartment of Perinatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7022-3029
Yaprak Engin ÜstünDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Woman’s Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-1011-3848
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRZübeyde Hanim Maternity Hospital · TRUniversity of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine factors affecting obstetric outcomes in pregnancies after conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold-knife conization (CKC) due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Material and Methods: The maternal and clinical characteristics and obstetric outcomes of CKC, LEEP and control groups were evaluated and compared. Risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: The incidence of preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), low APGAR scores, fetal mortality, and late-period spontaneous abortus was highest in patients who underwent CKC (p<0.05). Cone depth of CKC was greater than LEEP (p=0.025). Cervical length (CL) at pregnancy was CKC < LEEP < controls (p=0.003). Shorter CL at pregnancy and time from conization to pregnancy (t-CP) was correlated with a high incidence of preterm delivery and PPROM (p<0.05). To predict preterm delivery, t-CP <14 months had 63.16% sensitivity and 77.42% specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.714, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.603-0.809); p=0.005], and CL at pregnancy <31 mm had 65% sensitivity and 71.78% specificity [AUC: 0.731, 95% CI: (0.675-0.782); p<0.001]. To predict PPROM, t-CP <15 months had 85.71% sensitivity and 65.22% specificity [AUC: 0.730, 95% CI: (0.603-0.809); p=0.024], and CL <32 mm had 72.73% sensitivity and 61.89% spcificity [AUC: 0.685, 95% CI: (0.675-0.782); p=0.007]. Conclusion: Compared with CKC, LEEP has shorter cone depth and fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes. The t-CP <14 months was a risk for preterm delivery and <15 months was a risk for PPROM. CL at pregnancy <31 mm was a risk for preterm delivery and <32 mm was a risk for PPROM.

Indexed as

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasiacold-knife conizationconizationloop electrosurgical excision procedureobstetric outcome

Identifiers

PMID38063009
PMCPMC11632642
OpenAlexW4389482602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.