ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024
Factors affecting obstetric outcomes in patients who underwent cold-knife and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Outcomes After Cervical Cold Knife Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.JAMA surgery · 2026Article
- The association of post-conization pregnancy with subsequent cervical lesions: evidence from a nationwide cohort in Sweden.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in women under 25 years: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Differential Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes After Treatment of HIFU and LEEP in Patients with Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.International journal of women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine factors affecting obstetric outcomes in pregnancies after conization by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold-knife conization (CKC) due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Material and Methods: The maternal and clinical characteristics and obstetric outcomes of CKC, LEEP and control groups were evaluated and compared. Risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: The incidence of preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), low APGAR scores, fetal mortality, and late-period spontaneous abortus was highest in patients who underwent CKC (p<0.05). Cone depth of CKC was greater than LEEP (p=0.025). Cervical length (CL) at pregnancy was CKC < LEEP < controls (p=0.003). Shorter CL at pregnancy and time from conization to pregnancy (t-CP) was correlated with a high incidence of preterm delivery and PPROM (p<0.05). To predict preterm delivery, t-CP <14 months had 63.16% sensitivity and 77.42% specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.714, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.603-0.809); p=0.005], and CL at pregnancy <31 mm had 65% sensitivity and 71.78% specificity [AUC: 0.731, 95% CI: (0.675-0.782); p<0.001]. To predict PPROM, t-CP <15 months had 85.71% sensitivity and 65.22% specificity [AUC: 0.730, 95% CI: (0.603-0.809); p=0.024], and CL <32 mm had 72.73% sensitivity and 61.89% spcificity [AUC: 0.685, 95% CI: (0.675-0.782); p=0.007]. Conclusion: Compared with CKC, LEEP has shorter cone depth and fewer adverse pregnancy outcomes. The t-CP <14 months was a risk for preterm delivery and <15 months was a risk for PPROM. CL at pregnancy <31 mm was a risk for preterm delivery and <32 mm was a risk for PPROM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.