ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Efficacy Analysis of Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Regimens for Initial Treatment of FIGO Stages IB3 and IIA2 Cervical Cancer.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-Estrogen Therapy Achieves Complete Remission and Stability in Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Case Study.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large cancer lesions are often challenging to treat with surgical intervention alone. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is frequently used for FIGO stage IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancers to optimize the outcomes of radical surgeries. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, if necessary, with the traditional approach of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in treatment-naïve patients with cervical cancer of specified stages. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 245 female patients were administered either 70 to 85 mg/m² cisplatin and 165 to 175 mg/m² paclitaxel every 21 days (2 cycles) prior to radical hysterectomy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy if needed (neoadjuvant therapy, NT cohort, n=105), or received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy adjuvant therapy, AT cohort, n=140). RESULTS In the NT cohort, 76% of patients responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 24% did not. Adverse operative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were significantly more common among the non-responders (P<0.05). After 5 years, 91% of responders and 72% of non-responders survived without recurrence (P=0.0372), and 3% of responders and 28% of non-responders had died (P=0.0005). CONCLUSIONS The resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a poor prognostic factor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy appears to be advantageous for cervical cancer patients who respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.