Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062447›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2023

"Calling for help: i need you to listen'': a qualitative study of callers' experience of calls to the emergency medical communication centre.

Trine Berglie Spjeldnæs, Kristine A Vik Nilsen, Lars Myrmel, Jan-Oddvar Sørnes, Guttorm Brattebø

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Multi-method approach to the development of contextual telephone triage systems.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trine Berglie SpjeldnæsNord University Business School, Universitetsalléen 11, 8026, Bodø, Norway.
Kristine A Vik NilsenNord University Business School, Universitetsalléen 11, 8026, Bodø, Norway.
Lars MyrmelDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Jan-Oddvar SørnesNord University Business School, Universitetsalléen 11, 8026, Bodø, Norway.
Guttorm BrattebøNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Emergency Medical Communication (KoKom), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. guttorm.brattebo@helse-bergen.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7124-5641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Emergency Medical Communications Center (EMCC) is essential in emergencies and often represents the public's first encounter with the healthcare system. Previous research has mainly focused on the dispatcher's perspective. Therefore, there is a lack of insight into the callers' perspectives, the attainment of which may contribute significantly to improving the quality of this vital public service. Most calls are now made from mobile phones, opening up novel approaches for obtaining caller feedback using tools such as short-message services (SMS). Thus, this study aims to obtain a better understanding of callers' actual experiences and how they perceived their interaction with the EMCC.

methodsA combination of quantitative and qualitative study methods was used. An SMS survey was sent to the mobile phone numbers of everyone who had contacted 113 during the last months. This was followed by 31 semi-structured interviews with people either satisfied or dissatisfied. Thematic analysis was used to investigate the interviews.

resultsWe received 1680 (35%) responses to the SMS survey, sent to 4807 unique numbers. Most respondents (88%) were satisfied, evaluating their experience as 5 or 6 on a six-point scale, whereas 5% answered with 1 or 2. The interviews revealed that callers were in distress before calling 113. By actively listening and taking the caller seriously, and affirming that it was the right choice to call the emergency number, the EMCC make callers experience a feeling of help and satisfaction, regardless of whether an ambulance was dispatched to their location. If callers did not feel taken seriously or listened to, they were less satisfied. A negative experience may lead to a higher distress threshold and an adjusted strategy before the caller makes contact 113 next time. Callers with positive experiences expressed more trust in the healthcare systems.

conclusionsFor the callers, the most important was being taken seriously and listened to. Additionally, they welcomed that dispatchers express empathy and affirm that callers made the right choice to call EMCC, as this positively affects communication with callers. The 113 calls aimed to cooperate in finding a solution to the caller's problem.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesAmbulancesCommunicationEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsHospitalsHumansCommunicationEmergency medical assistanceEmergency medical communication centerEmergency medical dispatchEmergency medicinePatients/callersPerspectivesTrust

Identifiers

PMID38062447
PMCPMC10704617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.