Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062445›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

Pre-trained protein language model sheds new light on the prediction of Arabidopsis protein-protein interactions.

Kewei Zhou, Chenping Lei, Jingyan Zheng, Yan Huang, Ziding Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advances and opportunities for computational interrogation of plant proteins.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Machine-Learned Representations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent progress and future challenges in structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kewei ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chenping LeiState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jingyan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yan HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ziding ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. zidingzhang@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31271414, 31471249 and 31970645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein-protein interactions (PPIs) are heavily involved in many biological processes. Consequently, the identification of PPIs in the model plant Arabidopsis is of great significance to deeply understand plant growth and development, and then to promote the basic research of crop improvement. Although many experimental Arabidopsis PPIs have been determined currently, the known interactomic data of Arabidopsis is far from complete. In this context, developing effective machine learning models from existing PPI data to predict unknown Arabidopsis PPIs conveniently and rapidly is still urgently needed.

resultsWe used a large-scale pre-trained protein language model (pLM) called ESM-1b to convert protein sequences into high-dimensional vectors and then used them as the input of multilayer perceptron (MLP). To avoid the performance overestimation frequently occurring in PPI prediction, we employed stringent datasets to train and evaluate the predictive model. The results showed that the combination of ESM-1b and MLP (i.e., ESMAraPPI) achieved more accurate performance than the predictive models inferred from other pLMs or baseline sequence encoding schemes. In particular, the proposed ESMAraPPI yielded an AUPR value of 0.810 when tested on an independent test set where both proteins in each protein pair are unseen in the training dataset, suggesting its strong generalization and extrapolating ability. Moreover, the proposed ESMAraPPI model performed better than several state-of-the-art generic or plant-specific PPI predictors.

conclusionProtein sequence embeddings from the pre-trained model ESM-1b contain rich protein semantic information. By combining with the MLP algorithm, ESM-1b revealed excellent performance in predicting Arabidopsis PPIs. We anticipate that the proposed predictive model (ESMAraPPI) can serve as a very competitive tool to accelerate the identification of Arabidopsis interactome.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisMachine learningNatural language processingPre-trained language modelProtein–protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID38062445
PMCPMC10704805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.