Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062422›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Strategies to improve the magnetic resonance imaging experience for autistic individuals: a cross-sectional study exploring parents and carers' experiences.

Nikolaos Stogiannos, Georgia Pavlopoulou, Chris Papadopoulos, Gemma Walsh, Ben Potts, Sarah Moqbel, Antigoni Gkaravella, Jonathan McNulty, Clare Simcock, Sebastian Gaigg and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers and facilitators for participation in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in cancer research: a feasibility and acceptability analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Nikolaos StogiannosDepartment of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Georgia PavlopoulouDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, University College London, Institute of Education Group for Research in Relationships in NeuroDiversity-GRRAND, London, UK.
Chris PapadopoulosInstitute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Putteridge Bury Campus, Luton, UK. chris.papadopoulos@beds.ac.uk.
Gemma WalshDepartment of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Ben PottsDepartment of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Sarah MoqbelAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Antigoni GkaravellaAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Jonathan McNultySchool of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Clare SimcockInstitute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.
Sebastian GaiggDepartment of Psychology, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Dermot BowlerDepartment of Psychology, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Keith MaraisCommunity Involvement, University of London, London, UK.
Karen CleaverFaculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Jane Harvey LloydDepartment of Specialist Science Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Cláudia Sá Dos ReisSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES- SO), Lausanne, CH, Switzerland.
Christina MalamateniouDepartment of Midwifery & Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
City, University of London · GBAnna Freud Centre · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHSouthampton General Hospital · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Bedfordshire · GBUniversity of Greenwich · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutistic individuals encounter numerous barriers in accessing healthcare, including communication difficulties, sensory sensitivities, and a lack of appropriate adjustments. These issues are particularly acute during MRI scans, which involve confined spaces, loud noises, and the necessity to remain still. There remains no unified approach to preparing autistic individuals for MRI procedures.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted with parents and carers of autistic individuals in the UK to explore their experiences, barriers, and recommendations concerning MRI scans. The survey collected demographic information and experiential accounts of previous MRI procedures. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while key themes were identified within the qualitative data through inductive thematic analysis.

resultsSixteen parents/carers participated. The majority reported difficulties with communication, inadequate pre-scan preparation, and insufficient adjustments during MRI scans for their autistic children. Key barriers included an overwhelming sensory environment, radiographers' limited understanding of autism, and anxiety stemming from uncertainties about the procedure. Recommended improvements encompassed accessible communication, pre-visit familiarisation, noise-reduction and sensory adaptations, staff training on autism, and greater flexibility to meet individual needs.

conclusionsThere is an urgent need to enhance MRI experiences for autistic individuals. This can be achieved through improved staff knowledge, effective communication strategies, thorough pre-scan preparation, and tailored reasonable adjustments. Co-producing clear MRI guidelines with the autism community could standardise sensitive practices. An individualised approach is crucial for reducing anxiety and facilitating participation. Empowering radiographers through autism-specific education and incorporating insights from autistic individuals and their families could transform MRI experiences and outcomes.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderCaregiversChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingParentsAutismCarersHealthcare accessibilityInclusivityMagnetic resonance imagingParentsRadiography

Identifiers

PMID38062422
PMCPMC10704820
OpenAlexW4389429293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.