ArticleBMC genomics2023
Comparative genomic analysis of clinical Enterococcus faecalis distinguishes strains isolated from the bladder.
Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and biofilm-associated virulence in clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates from Hamedan, Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis ofGut microbes · 2025Article
- Evaluating urine volume and host depletion methods to enable genome-resolved metagenomics of the urobiome.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Genomic diversity, antibiotic resistance, and virulence in South African Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus lactis isolates.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnterococcus faecalis is the most commonly isolated enterococcal species in clinical infection. This bacterium is notorious for its ability to share genetic content within and outside of its species. With this increased proficiency for horizontal gene transfer, tremendous genomic diversity within this species has been identified. Many researchers have hypothesized E. faecalis exhibits niche adaptation to establish infections or colonize various parts of the human body. Here, we hypothesize that E. faecalis strains isolated from the human bladder will carry unique genomic content compared to clinical strains isolated from other sources.
resultsThis analysis includes comparison of 111 E. faecalis genomes isolated from bladder, urogenital, blood, and fecal samples. Phylogenomic comparison shows no association between isolation source and lineage; however, accessory genome comparison differentiates blood and bladder genomes. Further gene enrichment analysis identifies gene functions, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, and plasmid-associated genes that are enriched or rare in bladder genomes compared to urogenital, blood, and fecal genomes. Using these findings as training data and 682 publicly available genomes as test data, machine learning classifiers successfully distinguished between bladder and non-bladder strains with high accuracy. Genes identified as important for this differentiation were often related to transposable elements and phage, including 3 prophage species found almost exclusively in bladder and urogenital genomes.
conclusionsE. faecalis strains isolated from the bladder contain unique genomic content when compared to strains isolated from other body sites. This genomic diversity is most likely due to horizontal gene transfer, as evidenced by lack of phylogenomic clustering and enrichment of transposable elements and prophages. Investigation into how these enriched genes influence host-microbe interactions may elucidate gene functions required for successful bladder colonization and disease establishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.