SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023
Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion: An umbrella review of postoperative outcomes.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laminectomy vs. laminoplasty for treating multi-segment cervical canal stenosis combined with central cord syndrome in the absence of fracture or dislocation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Safety and functional evaluation of a synthetic lamina cover that replaces lost autologous spinal bone after laminectomy, in a sheep and human study.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Comparative Biomechanical Stability of the Fixation of Different Miniplates in Restorative Laminoplasty after Laminectomy: A Finite Element Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While multiple studies exist comparing cervical laminoplasty (CLP) and posterior cervical laminectomy with fusion (PCF), no clear consensus exists on which intervention is better. An umbrella review helps provide an overall assessment by analyzing a given condition's multiple interventions and outcomes. It integrates all available information on a topic and allows a consensus to be reached on the intervention of choice. A literature search was conducted using specific search criteria in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Titles and abstracts were screened based on inclusion criteria. A full-text review of articles that passed the initial inclusion criteria was performed. Nine meta-analyses were deemed eligible for the umbrella review. Data was extracted on reported variables from these meta-analyses. Subsequent quality assessment using AMSTAR2 and data analysis using the R package metaumbrella were used to determine the significance of postoperative outcomes. When the meta-analyses were pooled, statistically significant differences between CLP and PCF were found for postoperative overall complications rate and postoperative JOA score. PCF was associated with a lower overall complication rate and a higher postoperative JOA score, both supported by a weak level of evidence (class IV). Data regarding all other outcomes were non-significant. Our umbrella review investigates CLP and PCF by providing a comprehensive overview of existing evidence and evaluating inconsistencies within the literature. This umbrella review revealed that PCF had better outcomes for overall complications rate and postoperative JOA than CLP, but they were classified as being of weak significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.