Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062265›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Reconstruction of Scroll and Pitanguy's Ligaments in Open Rhinoplasty: A Controlled Randomized Study.

Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Riccardo De Bernardis, Paolo Persichetti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mauro BaroneFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Rosa SalzilloFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. rosasalzillo@hotmail.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1596-5919
Riccardo De BernardisFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Paolo PersichettiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the preservation rhinoplasty era, ligament management represents a hot topic. The aim of this study is to analyze the role of ligaments as indispensable elements of support of the nasal tip to have an adequate, safe, and predictable aesthetic and functional result. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients meeting the following criteria were included in the study: primary rhinoplasty, minimum 2-year follow-up, proficiency in Italian language, signed consent, and standardized pre- and postoperative photographic documentation. The study was performed with a double-blinded randomized design; both the patients and two of the authors measuring outcomes were blinded to the treatment methods. All patients were asked to answer the FACE-Q satisfaction with the nose postoperative scale. Two plastic surgeons reviewed all postoperative photographs, rating the outcome on a 1-5 VAS scale.

resultsOne hundred and twelve patients were enrolled, 47 males and 65 females, aged between 20 and 50 years. Patients were randomly divided in three groups: group 1, ligament reconstruction and grafts; group 2, only grafts (shield, single and double onlay, umbrella); and group 3, only ligament reconstruction with columellar strut. All rhinoplasties were performed with an open approach. Both the FACE-Q and VAS scores were in groups 1 and 2, which were also the ones undergoing fewer secondary procedures compared to group 3.

conclusionsThe best surgical option appears to be the combination of ligament repair and grafts. It reduces dead space and enables a better redraping of soft tissues, obtaining a better control of tip projection, position, and rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

EstheticsLigamentsRhinoplastyAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFACE-QLigamentsPreservation rhinoplastyPROMsRhinoplastyTip surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.