Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062222›Full record

ArticleThe patient2024

Quality of Life in Adults with Chronic Cough: A Mixed Methods Study Informing the Development of a Quantitative Patient Preference Study.

Theresa Coles, Molly McFatrich, Helen Ding, Nicole Lucas, Erin Daniell, Aparna Swaminathan, Jonathan Schelfhout, Reed Johnson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theresa ColesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA. theresa.coles@duke.edu.
Molly McFatrichDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Helen DingMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Nicole LucasDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Erin DaniellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Aparna SwaminathanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Jonathan SchelfhoutMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Reed JohnsonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to describe quality of life for patients with chronic cough (CC) and identify meaningful attributes that affect patient treatment preferences to inform the design of a quantitative preference study.

methodsEligible patients (≥ 18 years) with a CC (> 8 weeks) participated in qualitative interviews with two defined steps. Step one: concept elicitation and bidding games were used to collect descriptions of patient experiences with CC and identify important CC-related attributes. Step two: attributes were confirmed using concept elicitation and bidding games and prioritized using structured card sort activities. Purposive sampling ensured diversity of patient experiences. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze participant narratives, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize card sort results. This study follows a fully mixed concurrent dominant status design, with qualitative (dominant) and quantitative components.

resultsA total of 20 participants were interviewed with a mean age of 61.4 years (range 24-79 years). Coughing episodes, described as intense consecutive coughs that made catching breath difficult, were important to most participants (n = 17). Participants emphasized the emotional impact of episodes including feelings of uncertainty, loss of control, self-consciousness, and fear. Severity of CC was most often judged by frequency (n = 11) and intensity (n = 12) of cough. Daily, physical, or social activities were impacted for most participants. Impact on sleep (n = 14) included waking during the night, difficulty falling asleep, and daytime fatigue. Medication-related taste disturbances were an important consideration for what participants were willing to accept in exchange for cough relief.

conclusionsThis study emphasizes the importance of coughing episodes for adults with CC and provides initial evidence that taste alterations are an important component of patient treatment decisions for CC.

Indexed as

Chronic CoughPatient PreferenceQuality of LifeAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.