ArticleSpinal cord2024
Experiences of people with spinal cord injuries readmitted for continence-related complications: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in Spinal cord, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designQualitative descriptive.
objectivesTo describe the experiences of people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) re-admitted to the hospital due to continence-related complications.
settingInpatient service of a large spinal unit in North-West of Italy.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted on a purposive sample of people with SCI (n = 11; age range 22-66 years, n = 5 females, n = 6 with cervical injuries), audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim (duration range 38-52 min). Data were analysed inductively using the thematic analysis approach as described by Braun and Clarke.
resultsThree main themes were identified: (i) managing the frustration of continence-related complications; (ii) finding your way to deal with continence-related complications; (iii) identifying precise needs to deal with continence-related complications. Obtained findings highlighted the perceived emotional and physical burden suffered by people with SCI and their caregivers regarding the constant look for solutions and renounces to social participation, the different strategies implemented to address continence-related complications, and the unmet or partially met needs of people with SCI regarding support in transition to the community, infrastructure, and reliable information or education.
conclusionsContinence-related complications have a significant impact on the lives of people with SCI and their families. Interventions using technological tools and peer participation could reduce the burden associated with continence-related complications. Specific instruments are needed to facilitate evaluation, goal setting, and promote discussion of continence to allow HCPs to support people with SCI. Structured follow-up for SCI survivors should also focus on their needs to improve knowledge, facilitate decision making, and promote preventive behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38062213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.