Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062207›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2023

Open-ComBind: harnessing unlabeled data for improved binding pose prediction.

Andrew T McNutt, David Ryan Koes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew T McNuttDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David Ryan KoesDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. dkoes@pitt.edu.

Funding

New Methods and Tools for Computational Drug Discovery: Diversity SupplementR35GM140753 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOES, DAVID RYAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140753NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM140753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of the bound pose of a ligand is a critical first step in many in silico drug discovery tasks. Molecular docking is the main tool for the prediction of non-covalent binding of a protein and ligand system. Molecular docking pipelines often only utilize the information of one ligand binding to the protein despite the commonly held hypothesis that different ligands share binding interactions when bound to the same receptor. Here we describe Open-ComBind, an easy-to-use, open-source version of the ComBind molecular docking pipeline that leverages information from multiple ligands without known bound structures to enhance pose selection. We first create distributions of feature similarities between ligand pose pairs, comparing near-native poses with all sampled docked poses. These distributions capture the likelihood of observing similar features, such as hydrogen bonds or hydrophobic contacts, in different pose configurations. These similarity distributions are then combined with a per-ligand docking score to enhance overall pose selection by 5% and 4.5% for high-affinity and congeneric series helper ligands, respectively. Open-ComBind reduces the average RMSD of ligands in our benchmark dataset by 9.0%. We provide Open-ComBind as an easy-to-use command line and Python API to increase pose prediction performance at www.github.com/drewnutt/open_combind .

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsBinding SitesLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsProteinsMachine learningMolecular dockingOpen-sourceStructure-based drug design

Identifiers

PMID38062207
PMCPMC10703974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.