Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062200›Full record

ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Using self-monitoring to detect and manage raised blood pressure and pre-eclampsia during pregnancy: the BUMP research programme and its impact.

Katherine L Tucker, Lisa Hinton, Marcus Green, Lucy C Chappell, Richard J McManus

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07115199 (Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07115199 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy (REACH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2026 to 2029Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Hypertension in PregnancyArmsRemote Patient Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical significance of severe proteinuria in preeclampsia: a multicenter study of maternal and neonatal outcomes.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine L TuckerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lisa HintonThe Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marcus GreenAction on Pre-Eclampsia (APEC), Charity, Worcestershire, UK.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. richard.mcmanus@phc.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raised blood pressure affects around ten percent of pregnancies worldwide, causing maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Self-monitoring of blood pressure during higher-risk or hypertensive pregnancy has been shown to be feasible, acceptable, safe, and no more expensive than usual care alone. Additionally, self-testing for proteinuria has been shown to be just as accurate as healthcare professional testing, creating the potential for monitoring of multiple indicators through pregnancy. The work suggests however, that an organisational shift is needed to properly use and see benefits from self-monitored readings. This paper describes the findings from a large programme of work examining the use of self-monitoring in pregnancy, summarising the findings in the context of the wider literature and current clinical context. The BUMP Research Programme developed and tested self-monitoring and self-testing interventions for pregnancy. The work showed that self-monitoring during pregnancy was feasible, acceptable, safe, and no more expensive, but did not improve the detection or control of hypertension.

Indexed as

HypertensionPre-EclampsiaBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansPregnancyBlood pressureHypertensionPre-eclampsiaPregnancySelf-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38062200
PMCPMC10912026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.