Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062168›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2024

A Pluridisciplinary Tracheostomy Weaning Protocol for Brain-Injured Patients, Outside of the Intensive Care Unit and Without Instrumental Assessment: Results of Pilot Study.

Thomas Gallice, Emmanuelle Cugy, Christine Germain, Clément Barthélemy, Julie Laimay, Julie Gaube, Mélanie Engelhardt, Olivier Branchard, Elodie Maloizel, Eric Frison and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03512054 (Pilot Study Evaluating the Success), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03512054 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Study Evaluating the Success (= Safe Decannulation) of a Standardized Tracheotomy Weaning Procedure in Brain-injury's Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2018 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsTracheostomy, Brain InjuriesArmsStandardized 5-step weaning procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thomas GalliceNeurosurgery Unit B, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France. thomas.gallice@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-2617
Emmanuelle CugyPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Swallowing Evaluation Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Tastet-Girard Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Christine GermainMedical Information Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Clément BarthélemyNeurological ICU, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Julie LaimayNeurosurgery Unit B, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Julie GaubeNeurological ICU, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Mélanie EngelhardtPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Swallowing Evaluation Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Tastet-Girard Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier BranchardNeurosurgery Unit B, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Elodie MaloizelNeurosurgery Unit B, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Eric FrisonMedical Information Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick DehailBordeaux Research Center for Population Health (BPH), Team: ACTIVE, University Bordeaux Segalen, UMR_S 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuel CunyNeurological ICU, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pellegrin Hospital, 33000, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux CHUBX 2017/31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrently to the recent development of percutaneous tracheostomy techniques in the intensive care unit (ICU), the amount of tracheostomized brain-injured patients has increased. Despites its advantages, tracheostomy may represent an obstacle to their orientation towards conventional hospitalization or rehabilitation services. To date, there is no recommendation for tracheostomy weaning outside of the ICU. We created a pluridisciplinary tracheostomy weaning protocol relying on standardized criteria but adapted to each patient's characteristics and that does not require instrumental assessment. It was tested in a prospective, single-centre, non-randomized cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, hospitalized for an acquired brain injury (ABI), tracheostomized during an ICU stay, and weaned from mechanical ventilation. The exclusion criterion was severe malnutrition. Decannulation failure was defined as recannulation within 96 h after decannulation. Thirty tracheostomized ABI patients from our neurosurgery department were successively and exhaustively included after ICU discharge. Twenty-six patients were decannulated (decannulation rate, 90%). None of them were recannulated (success rate, 100%). Two patients never reached the decannulation stage. Two patients died during the procedure. Mean tracheostomy weaning duration (inclusion to decannulation) was 7.6 (standard deviation [SD]: 4.6) days and mean total tracheostomy time (insertion to decannulation) was 42.5 (SD: 24.8) days. Our results demonstrate that our protocol might be able to determine without instrumental assessment which patient can be successfully decannulated. Therefore, it may be used safely outside ICU or a specialized unit. Moreover, our tracheostomy weaning duration is very short as compared to the current literature.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesIntensive Care UnitsTracheostomyVentilator WeaningAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialAcquired brain injuryDecannulationPost intensive care unitRehabilitationTracheostomy weaning

Identifiers

PMID38062168
PMCPMC11239749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.