Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38062116›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Efficacy of a computer based discontinuation strategy to reduce PPI prescriptions: a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Julia Heisig, Bettina Bücker, Alexandra Schmidt, Anne-Lisa Heye, Anja Rieckert, Susanne Löscher, Oliver Hirsch, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Stefan Wilm, Anne Barzel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Julia HeisigDepartment of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. julia.heisig@uni-marburg.de.
Bettina BückerInstitute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Alexandra SchmidtChair of General Practice II and Patient-Centeredness in Primary Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (IGPPC), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Anne-Lisa HeyeChair of General Practice I and Interprofessional Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (IGPPC), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Anja RieckertChair of General Practice II and Patient-Centeredness in Primary Care, Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (IGPPC), Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Susanne LöscherInstitute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Oliver HirschDepartment of Psychology, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Siegen, Germany.
Norbert Donner-BanzhoffDepartment of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anne BarzelDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Annette BeckerDepartment of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Annika ViniolDepartment of Primary Care, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEFOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01VSF17025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deprescribing of inappropriate long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is challenging and there is a lack of useful methods for general practitioners to tackle this. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of the electronic decision aid tool arriba-PPI on reduction of long-term PPI intake. Participants (64.5 ± 12.9 years; 54.4% women) with a PPI intake of at least 6 months were randomized to receive either consultation with arriba-PPI from their general practitioner (n = 1256) or treatment as usual (n = 1131). PPI prescriptions were monitored 6 months before, 6 and 12 months after study initiation. In 49.2% of the consultations with arriba-PPI, the general practitioners and their patients made the decision to reduce or discontinue PPI intake. At 6 months, there was a significant reduction by 22.3% (95% CI 18.55 to 25.98; p < 0.0001) of defined daily doses (DDD) of PPI. A reduction of 3.3% (95% CI - 7.18 to + 0.62) was observed in the control group. At 12 months, the reduction of DDD-PPI remained stable in intervention patients (+ 3.5%, 95% CI - 0.99 to + 8.03), whereas control patients showed a reduction of DDD-PPI (- 10.2%, 95% CI - 6.01 to - 14.33). Consultation with arriba-PPI led to reduced prescription rates of PPI in primary care practices. Arriba-PPI can be a helpful tool for general practitioners to start a conversation with their patients about risks of long-term PPI intake, reduction or deprescribing unnecessary PPI medication.

Indexed as

General PractitionersProton Pump InhibitorsCognitionCommunicationFemaleHumansMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Proton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38062116
PMCPMC10703926
OpenAlexW4389429171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.