ArticleBMJ case reports2023
Atypical presentation of malignant hypertension.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macular Edema Without Vascular Leakage - The Diagnostic Challenge of SNIFR and its Differential Diagnoses.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Meningeal Carcinomatosis with Bilateral Optic Disc Edema in the Absence of Intracranial Hypertensive Symptoms: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A woman in her 30s presented with complaints of sudden onset of defective vision in the right eye for 2 days, with history of headache for a month. On examination, best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Anterior segment examination was normal. Fundus examination of both the eyes showed generalised arteriolar attenuation with diffuse, hyperaemic disc oedema and serous retinal detachment at macula in the right eye. Her blood pressure (BP) was 230/140 mm Hg. Other systemic evaluation was unremarkable. In the review visit, patient's BP reduced to 140/100 mm Hg, and visual acuity in the right eye improved to 20/20. Fundus in the right eye showed resolving disc oedema with macular star formation, and the left eye had developed soft exudates. This seemed to confirm the diagnosis of the disc oedema being caused by hypertension and a highly asymmetrical presentation of hypertensive retinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.