ArticleSalud publica de Mexico2023
Article in Salud publica de Mexico, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo reveal whether motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is associated with falls, recurrent falls, and complicated falls in older Mexican adults. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. MCR was assessed in 2012 and included fall-related outcomes (recurrent [≥2], complicated [need for medical treatment] and number) in the 2018 follow-up. Competing risks analysis was performed, and subhazard ratios (sHRs) were estimated, adjusting for different variables. Negative binomial regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of the number of falls.
resultsA total of 1 929 participants were included, with a median age of 62 years and 58.3% female. The prevalence of MCR was 17.4% and was associated with falls sHR 1.11 (95%CI: 1.11, 1.12), recurrent falls sHR 1.16 (95%CI: 1.15, 1.16) and complicated falls sHR 1.25 (95%CI: 1.24, 1.25). The number of falls was also independently associated with baseline MCR (IRR 1.19; 95% CI 1.01, 1.40; p=0.039).
conclusionMCR is independently associated with falls. Increasing the evidence on how MCR anticipates burdensome problems in older adults could lead to actions to halt them; therefore, including it in screening assessments could be clinically useful.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.