Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060751›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

The Efficiency of Cervical Pap and Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology: A Review.

Shirin Dasgupta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shirin DasguptaDr. B. C. Roy Multi Speciality Medical Research Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, IND.
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the leading health burdens globally with a huge incidence in developing countries like India. Cervical cancer has an extended premalignant stage known as cervical dysplasia or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). CIN can be grade 1, 2, or 3 depending on its severity. One of the most effective methods of cervical cancer screening and prevention is detecting these premalignant lesions by cervical cytology. Pioneered by Dr. George Nicholas Papanicolaou, the Papanicolaou (Pap) stain became an important advent for the microscopic evaluation of the exfoliated cervical cells. Over the years, this method of conventional Pap smear became more practiced and yielded excellent results, so much so that the incidence of cervical cancer actually started to decline in developed countries. However, few drawbacks started to become evident with conventional Pap smears like unsatisfactory samples due to obscuring materials, false negative results due to sampling error, and low sensitivity. To overcome these drawbacks of conventional Pap smear, liquid-based cytology (LBC) was introduced in 1996. Thereafter, many investigations and studies have been conducted by many authors to compare the efficacy of conventional Pap smear and LBC. This review puts forward the facts and results of various studies pertaining to efficacy of cervical cytology, comparing conventional Pap smear and LBC, and highlighting the pros and cons of each method based on various studies. For this review, relevant articles under the headings "Conventional PAP smear", "Cervical cancer screening", "Liquid-based cytology" and "Comparison" have been searched in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. About 100 articles were studied, and all the facts have been highlighted. While many studies did support LBC over conventional Pap smear for screening of cervical abnormalities, some studies did not find any major difference between the two and preferred the practice of conventional Pap smear in our Indian scenario considering the low-resource setting and low price. This research highlights the various facts of the two types of cervical Pap smear and their comparison.

Indexed as

cervical cancercervical intraepithelial neoplasia (cin)conventional pap smeardiagnostic efficacyliquid-based cytology

Identifiers

PMID38060751
PMCPMC10698710
OpenAlexW4388413540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.