ArticleCureus2023
Impact of Atmospheric Conditions on Epistaxis Incidence.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epistaxis in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet: Prevalence, Risk Factors at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Meteorological factors modulate idiopathic epistaxis risk: a 12-year retrospective study in Changshu.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The importance of the anterior ethmoidal artery in idiopathic epistaxis: a retrospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA possible correlation between epistaxis occurrence and atmospheric parameters' variation has long been hypothesized. This study aims to determine whether cumulative epistaxis incidence is related to seasonal variation and its relationship to monthly, weekly, and daily recordings of atmospheric measurements in the city of Patras, Greece.
methodsIn this retrospective study, data concerning the patients who presented with active epistaxis at the ED of a tertiary university hospital in Western Greece between January 2020 and December 2021 were collected. Only cases of spontaneous epistaxis were included in the study; patients bleeding secondarily due to a known mechanical cause, i.e., a tumor, trauma, or surgery, were excluded. The measurements of atmospheric parameters were supplied by the Department of Physics, University of Patras.
resultsIn total, 230 cases of spontaneous, active epistaxis were evaluated in the ED over the course of the study. The median frequency of epistaxis presentations was two cases per week. Most of the patients were male, comprising 62.6% of the cohort, and the median age stood at 70 years, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 54 to 81 years. A minor yet statistically significant negative correlation between the incidence of epistaxis and mean relative humidity was observed both on a daily and weekly basis. Mean relative humidity emerged as a significant predictor for the incidence of epistaxis, both daily and weekly. Significantly lower mean relative humidity values were recorded during weeks with a high incidence of epistaxis cases (57.72% vs. 63.39%, p = 0.02). No discernible seasonality was observed in the frequency of epistaxis presentations to the ED.
conclusionA modest yet statistically significant trend toward fewer epistaxis cases was observed in conditions of higher ambient humidity during the study period in the region of Western Greece.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.