Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38060709›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Technical specifications of dose management systems: An international atomic energy agency survey.

Ioannis A Tsalafoutas, Laurentcia Arlany, Egor Titovich, Yaroslav Pynda, Ricardo Ruggeri, Roberto Mariano Sánchez, Ingrid Reiser, Virginia Tsapaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ioannis A TsalafoutasHamad Medical Corporation, Occupational Health and Safety, Medical Physics Section, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-1682
Laurentcia ArlanySengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Egor TitovichDosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Yaroslav PyndaDivision of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Ricardo RuggeriFundación Médica de Río Negro y Neuquén-Leben Salud, Rio Negro, Argentina.
Roberto Mariano SánchezServicio de Física Médica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Ingrid ReiserDepartment of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Virginia TsapakiDosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDose management systems (DMS) have been introduced in radiological services to facilitate patient radiation dose management and optimization in medical imaging. The purpose of this study was to gather as much information as possible on the technical characteristics of DMS currently available, regarding features that may be considered essential for simply ensuring regulatory compliance or desirable to fully utilize the potential role of DMS in optimization of many aspects of radiological examinations.

methodsA technical survey was carried out and all DMS developers currently available (both commercial and open source) were contacted and were asked to participate. An extensive questionnaire was prepared and uploaded in the IAEA International Research Integration System (IRIS) online platform which was used for data collection process. Most of the questions (93%) required a "Yes/No" answer, to facilitate an objective analysis of the survey results. Some free text questions and comments' slots were also included, to allow participants to give additional information and clarifications where necessary. Depending on the answer, they were considered either as "Yes" or "No."

resultsGiven the way that the questions were posed, every positive response indicated that a feature was offered. Thus, the percentage of positive responses was used as a measure of adherence. The percentages of positive answers per section (and sub-section) are presented in graphs and limitations of this type of analysis are discussed in detail.

conclusionsThe results of this survey clearly exhibit that large differences exist between the various DMS developers. Consequently, potential end users of a DMS should carefully determine which of the features available are essential for their needs, prioritize desirable features, but also consider their infrastructure, the level of support required and the budget available before selecting a DMS.

Indexed as

Nuclear EnergyHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdose management systemsoptimizationpatient radiation doseradiological examinations

Identifiers

PMID38060709
PMCPMC10795438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.