ArticleGlobal spine journal2025
Surgical Treatments and Long-Term Outcomes for Pediatric Patients With Lumbar Spinal Tumors.
Article in Global spine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective case‒control study.
objectivesThis study aimed to report the effects of surgical intervention on spinal stability recovery and to assess the long-term outcomes of children and adolescents with lumbar tumors.
methodsFrom January 2016 to June 2021, 42 pediatric patients with lumbar tumors were selected and separated into different groups based on the surgical method used (total en bloc resection (TER) group, n = 21; piecemeal resection (PR) group, n = 21; titanium mesh (TM) group n = 23; artificial vertebrae (AV) group n = 19). The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and related outcomes were described in detail and compared between groups, with
resultsThe average follow-up duration was 24.89 months, and the mean age was 14.89 ± 2.41 years. There were no significant differences in the mean operation time, average blood loss, complication rate, or length of hospital stay between the groups. The ODI, VAS and JOA scores at the final follow-up (FF) were elevated after surgery in all groups. The FF local angular drift (LOD) and lumbar angular drift (LUD) were greater in the TM group than in the AV group (
conclusionsAfter surgery, pediatric patients with lumbar tumors can obtain satisfactory spinal stability, effective relief of pain symptoms and substantial improvements in neurological function. There was no significant difference in the invasiveness, safety or timeliness between the 2 surgical methods, so TER is recommended due to its low postoperative recurrence rate and good local control. Spinal fusion in the AV group resulted in better spinal stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.